Posts Tagged ‘imperialism’


This series seeks to help create a body of resistance literature that will chronicle the collective radicalization of a Black Masculinity movement that seeks to decolonize our minds and invent identities, in resistance, that transcend stereotypes. We will speak up and force the world to deal with us. The first step is to come back to ourselves.

The Story

I met an African woman at an eating area near my job once. I used to see her there early in the morning smoking. One day she came up to me and asked me if I had a light for the cigarette she held in her hand. I looked into my backpack and handed her a lighter. As she lit her cigarette she smiled and we made small talk. I found out she owned one of the restaurants in the area. She kept looking around her as she smoked and I asked her what was wrong. She laughed and said that her husband and children didn’t know she smoked. I asked her if that’s why I would see her chain smoking in the mornings and she laughed and said yes. She said she couldn’t smoke at home. She said that her husband was African as well and that where she was from women didn’t smoke or do things like that — that it was frowned upon. She said that women are held in high regard but they are expected to be and act a certain way or it is considered shameful to their family. When I heard this I had a mixed reaction. Part of me thought it was nice that Black women were revered but then I thought that if that reverence pressured them into ways of being that didn’t come naturally then maybe that’s not such a good thing. I asked her how she felt about that and her reaction was almost as mixed as mine. She liked that women were treated with reverence but she didn’t like that they were boxed in terms of behavior.

Long after our conversation I kept thinking about the things she’d said and the way she’d said them. And then I thought about my reaction and thoughts about what she’d said. It took a few months for me to really come up with the words to articulate, but when it came down to it, I thought that the whole thing was about desire and possession from the male gaze.

The Systemsblack madonna

In thinking about that meeting with the woman I met, I thought about Black women in America and they suffer a similar dynamic of oppression. America being an imperialist, capitalist, white-supremacist, patriarchy shapes the mainstream opinion through the gaze of men (usually rich White men). That gaze when placed upon women often offers only 2 stations in life: madonnas and whores.

The reason for these polarized options for women lies in the systems of oppression that shape the majority of male thinking. Most specifically imperialism and patriarchy. These two systems impress upon the male thinking and direct the male gaze in such a manner that creates an oppressive presence to women.

Imperialism teaches the male mind to conquer and possess that which is desired. For example, the colonists who fled Britain in search of freedom desired a country of their own and they stumbled upon America and despite finding it populated with people, they sought to conquer those people and possess their land. This is the sentiment that American ideals teach men is manly, masculine, and/or appropriate male behavior.

Patriarchy teaches the male mind that women are objects separate and different from men. Patriarchy objectifies women through the validation of physical differences chosen by natural selection to create male and female. This distinction is further exploited by patriarchy and social conditioning to create a position for women that is separate (as it should be to some extent) but not equal (as it never should be) to men. This objectification makes a dynamic between men and women where women are objects to be desired by men and (through imperialistic teaching) conquered and possessed. This is the American male gaze which mostly offers women two options: madonna or whore.

Madonnas and Whoresisis9

The madonna is desired for her purity and self-sacrifice. She is the archetype of everything good in a woman from the imperialistic patriarchal gaze. She is the madonna: almost a goddess, to be worshiped for her chastity, her devotion to man, and her willingness to sacrifice herself for his cause. Even when she is not sought after to be possessed physically through sex, marriage, or slavery, she is possessed through the males fantastical reverence and worship of her. Don’t be fooled that this is not oppression, it very much is. It is the most insidious form of oppression in that it manifests in the likeness of love — a doppelgänger of affection. The oppression takes place in that it does not allow the woman who is relagated to the Madonna position to be human, flawed, full of contradictions, imperfections, desires, and urges. She is the Madonna meant to sit quietly on eternal captivation of her husband and son (almost never daughter). She is a statue to be attended to and never engaged.

The whore is the other woman. Her station is low and unrespectable. Because of that station she is expected to bear the lowest treatment and to succumb to the males filthiest urges. She is the un-revered object that is meant for possession, use, and disposal. The whore is the antithesis of the Madonna: she is common and  tangible and all of the desire for her possession is related to that which has already possessed her and/or her willingness to subservient to man. There is a freedom to be obtained from the whore in that, unlike the Madonna, the whore requires nothing (whereas the Madonna requires reverence and devotion). The whore shares a similar oppression as the Madonna because she too is not human: she is not allowed to have feelings and she is not worthy of true love.

The Problem

The issue is that women are just as complex (if not more) creatures as men. There is no 1 or 2 archetypes that describe every woman. Nor can any archetypes describe any individual woman who may move through a number of characteristics associated with anyone archetype or stereotype. Her development should not be constrained by a singular period of her development in which she explored any aspect of herself. Often men are afforded the benefit of having a period of exploration in which he can be and act in complete opposition to the man he one day becomes; however, he is not condemned to wearing a scarlet letter for his actions. In many ways women are not expected to uphold the stringent requirements of the madonna position. But they are usually looked down upon if it is ever discovered that they have not. Opening_of_the_Mouth_-_Tutankhamun_and_AjaThat is a problem. Like all human beings, women, should be allowed redemption as much as the next guy. to assert that a man can have a faze of ‘sowing his oates’ and asserting that a woman does not or shoudl not have similar urges is preposterous. Women, like every other human being on this planet, is flawed and is growing and learning within the their own developmental capacity. That should never make her less or more of a respectable woman. It should, in fact, make her human. Just as much human as any man.

The Point

The issue is that these 2 options of madonna or whore leaves no room for women to assert themselves as both sensual and sexual beings without the restriction of the male gaze. They are boxed in, by the male gaze, as 2 polarized extremees for which most women would fall along the spectrum (making them more human and equal to men) rather than one or the other. If we are to interact with women in a contemporary sense and allow them the freedom of personal expression that is offered to men, then we will have to realize that not every madonna is a goddess and not every whore is a disposable object. Women, like men, are capable of a diverse and contradictory arrangement of actions and values that may or may not be aligned with these traditional thoughts.

Women have every right to be a combination of traits that might fit within some of these traditional modes of thinking without their being bound to the extreme of the requirements for either. Women, like men, are human beings capable of a myriad of thoughts and behaviors that do not constitute any one persona. If we are to heal the connection between men and women, the imperialistic, patriarchal standard of the male gaze must be sacrificed to allow women the privilege and opportunity to be completely human: however flawed and imperfect that may be.

I’m not just sayin’; I’m just sayin’,

An Angry Black Man



A series, inspired by the CNN special, dedicated to race related identity issues concerning Black people in America.

The Story

More than any other group in America, the Black community has been thoroughly colonized into embodying the tragic American Nationalist identity. That identity being framed by imperialism, white-supremacy, capitalism, and patriarchy, flaws the ideologies produced by American culture. For the ideologies of the Black community, this is dangerously problematic.

American Nationalism

The framework of American Nationalism instills, in Americans who embrace it, a way of being and acting that is anchored by certain values and principles that justify these behaviors. For instance the fact that part of American Nationalism is an imperialistic world view and a white-supremacist domestic view means that those who embrace American Nationalism, inadvertently approach people who are non-white as non-American and anyone non-American is engaged with an air of fascism that relegates those individuals to being inferior because they are different. The other part of the American Nationalist framework is capitalism and patriarchy. Both of these ideologies provide the groundwork for hostile interpersonal relationships between citizens. In America, it is capitalism that creates social class and patriarchy that promotes gender supremacy (for males ofcourse). Capitalism with its promise of an economy not regulated by the government and the opportunity for anyone to ‘make it big’ is America’s greatest delusion. However, many Americans support and protect capitalism (usually the ones who have made gains within it or at least have the potential to). For Minorities (and by minorities I mean non-white ethnic groups and women) the playing field of capitalism is a mountain that begins on a slippery hill beneath the plateau that White Americans usually begin their climb. This means that because we begin with a deficit of financial resources and because of discrimination our ability to accumulate financial resources through working income or income generating assets, the playing field is not leveled. Since the capitalism relies on competition to obtain the greatest gains and the only way to be competitive is to have access to financial resources, which we can scarcely accumulate, then, in truth, we are never let into the game let alone allowed to play. This creates hostility between the haves and the have nots. It creates a social class system that surrounds material assets, prestige, and power. The 99% of Americans who do not and my never obtain such wealth, spend their lives working to try and obtain it. For minorities it becomes an obsession. For Black people, in particular, it becomes the standard against which we measure our lives, social standing, success, and self esteem.

Party to Privilege

It is from this obsession that if Black people have fought for the equal opportunity to access those things that they feel will allow them to climb the mountain of capitalistic success. Enter Affirmative Action. This piece of legislation opened doors for Black people — doors people still didn’t want open. So, even when Black people got there, they were met with resistance, discrimination, and prejudice. Being surrounded by an environment like that on a daily basis with no space to nurture, heal, and resist the bombarding messages, is dangerous. It often fractures the psyche of that individual as they try to reconcile how they have finally arrived but not really arrived at all.


The national middle class which takes over power at the end of the colonial regime is an under-developed middle class. It has practically no economic power, and in any case it is in no way commensurate with the bourgeoisie of the mother country which it hopes to replace. In its wilful narcissism, the national middle class is easily convinced that it can advantageously replace the middle class of the mother country.

– Frantz Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth

Those individuals who have been offered a seat at the welcome table and become party to privilege soon find that entry to these spaces and access to these opportunities does not erase the hatred that sought to keep them out. Instead the hatred just finds other ways of expressing itself and limiting the potential. This is something I have often seen in academia. I remember meeting Black students who were attending or had attended prestigious white universities. I remember all too often they looked like the walking dead. There seemed to be something hollow behind their eyes and they were defensive. These were the people that I saw viciously criticize their own community. And not in the tough love kind of way, they did it the way someone from outside the community might do it: with ignorance. What happened was they had gained access to this new world and in order to survive they had to assimilate. That brought a level of detachment from their own community. So that they could no longer understand their own people — and in many cases these students had always gone to predominately white schools and, therefore, never really had a sense of understanding Black people beyond their families. That is the cost of the ticket when you want to sit at the table of the privileged and even while you are allowed to sit and eat as a guest, you will never be considered a resident.

This native bourgeoisie, which has adopted unreservedly and with enthusiasm the ways of thinking characteristic of the mother country, which has become wonderfully detached from its own thought and has based its consciousness upon foundations which are typically foreign, will realize, with its mouth watering, that it lacks something essential to a bourgeoisie: money. The bourgeoisie of an under-developed country is a bourgeoisie in spirit only.

– Frantz Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth

The Talented Tenth

It is from this kind of experience that W.E.B. DuBois formulates his theory of the Talented Tenth. I remember reading The Negro problem for the first time and I remember the distaste I had while reading the essay, The Talented Tenth. I kept re-reading it because all of my professors went on and on about DuBois and I had researched the term after hearing one of my professors make mention of it to the class by telling us that we were as college students part of the talented tenth and that we had a duty to fulfill. So I kept reading this essay and I kept thinking, this motherfucker is elitist as hell! I finally decided that regardless of what anyone thought, that whole theory was bogus and problematic and that DuBois wasn’t all that to me. It was some years later when I returned to DuBoise body of work and discovered that he, himself, had later denounced the entire idea (now why the hell doesn’t anyone ever talk about that?! I guess because talented tenth is catchy and sounds nice).


When I came out of college into the world of work, I realized that it was quite possible that my plan of training a talented tenth might put into control and power a group of selfish, self indulgent well-to-do men, whose basic interest in solving the negro problem was personal; personal freedom and unhampered enjoyment and use of the world, without any real care, or certainly no arousing care as to what became of the mass of American negroes or of the mass of any people. — Selfishness is even more natural than sacrifice.

– W.E.B. DuBois, The Talented Tenth Memorial Address

DuBois, with an emphasis on education as a means of liberation, built this ideology in the hopes that other Black people who, like him, were finally gaining access to higher education, would lead their people. However, what he found beyond the safety of the academy was a much different reality. This revelation that he makes in his address clearly describes what has become of the Black middle class/Black Bourgeoisie, which by DuBois’ estimations would be the academics. Today’s Black academics take their seat at the welcome table and the only true concern that they have is to secure and retain their place and enjoy and use the world to secure a better place at the table of white-supremacy. That is our talented tenth.

The Guiding Hundredth

In his memorial address, DuBois revisioned his idea of the talented tenth of what he’d learned of the world outside the academy and the theories of Karl Marx and more radical minds. He then suggested that we realize that the struggle would have to be a “group-leadership” in which not just a few elites would change the destiny of the people, but the people themselves ‘with clear vision of present world conditions and dangers.”

This, then, in my re-examined and restated theory of the “Talented Tenth,” which has thus become the doctrine of the “Guiding Hundredth.”

-W.E.B. DuBois, The Talented Tenth Memorial Address

For whatever reason, it is only quietly noted that the concept of the Talented Tenth is an ideology that would never produce its intended results and would, in effect, create internal tensions for the Black community. Yet, we continue to glorify and glamorize it because, like well trained Americans, we want to believe that we are superior and privileged (even though it’s only supposed to be a tenth of the Black population which means some us were not meant to be Talented Tenthers). That is tragedy.

The Problem

The problem is that without first decolonizing one’s mind, a Black leader will stumble blindly through the imperialist white-supremacist capitalist patriarchy. Because they have not redesign and realigned their desires and values, they will only replicate the same system they sought to oppose.


It is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but, on the contrary, their social being determines their consciousness.

– Karl Marx, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy

Institutions are how ideology is passed along and sustained. This is not to say that any institution, by itself, is evil or bad. This is simply to say that it has an inherent flaw because of the system that designed it and that it must serve. For example, institutions of higher learning are excellent places for intellectual growth and scholarly development; however, most of these institutions serve at the pleasure of the federal government which allocates finances to students through grants and loans to students. So while indirect, there is a level of control beyond the institutions governing powers and that influences what gets taught, how policies are formed, and how students are engaged. So to enter an institution of higher learning is a worthwhile endeavor but one must struggle constantly to retain one’s own sensibilities and ideologies.

The Point

We must recognize that every institution by its inherent design holds the danger of leading us back into the imperialist white-supremacist capitalist patriarchy that we are trying to free ourselves from. If anything institutions lure us into them with the promise of freedom and change and once we are there they bombard us with their ideologies. It is an attack on radicalism. The attack is not an overt one; it is a gentle touch that soothes and a sweet voice that hypnotize and convinces us to pledge our allegiance to the lies once more.

Unless we fundamentally change and radicalize the ideologies of our culture, we cannot expect our institutions to do anything more than replicate what has been. Traditional institutions, as they are, cannot save us. This is the lesson to be learned from DuBois’ work on the Talented Tenth and the revision of that theory which became the Guiding Hundredth. That the only thing that will result from elitist, fascist thoughts that are supported by the ideals of American Nationalism, is division, selfishness, and a stagnation in actual progress. If we, as a Black people, are to fight this battle, we are going to have to do it together: as equals, as comrades, as a people.

I’m not sayin; I’m just sayin,

An Angry Black Man


DuBois, W.E.B. “The Talented Tenth Memorial Address.” 1948

Fanon, Frantz. “The Pitfalls of National Consciousness.” The Wretched of the Earth.

Marx, Karl. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy.

The Story
This tale begins with a revolution. Thirteen British colonies decided to reject the authority of Parliament and break from the empire. The motivation was a wave of liberal thinking that refused to support the aristocracies of Britain. This was the American Revolution which resulted in the Declaration of Independence and the establishment of the United States of America.
The ideology that fueled the revolution and set the tone for the national identity of the United States is best described by the philosophers of the time:
To understand political power right, and derive it from its original, we must consider, what state all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and person, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending upon the will of any other man.
A state also of equality, wherein all the power and jurisdiction is reciprical, no one having more than another; there being nothing more evident, than that creatures of the same species and rank, promiscuously born to all the same advantages of nature, and the use of the same faculties, should also be equal to one amongst another without subordination or subjection, unless the lord and master of them all should, by any manifest declaration of his will set one above another and confer on him by an evident and clear appointment, an undoubted right to dominion and sovereignty.
– John Locke, Second Treatise of Civil Government
But there is another and great distinction for which no truly natural or religious reason can be assigned, and that is the distinction of men into KINGS and SUBJECTS. Male and female are the distinctions of nature, good and bad the distinctions of Heaven; but how a race of men came into the world so exalted above the rest, and distinguished like some new species, is worth inquiring into, and whether they are the means of happiness or of misery to mankind.
                     – Thomas Paine, Common Sense
It was the revolutionaries hope to convince and assure the colonists that there was no reason that they should be held under the will of Great Britain. They sought to do so by dismantling the notion of aristocracy and the ‘God-given right to rule.’ In order to do so, they took a stance on society that suggested that all men are created equal by natural design. Once independence was achieved, the United States continued to develop their national identity according to the ideology that had won their independence. This is how we can see the appropriateness of the poem that was placed onto the Statue of Liberty:
Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”
– Emma Lazarus, New Colossus
It is then easy to see why the United States would create a national identity that is built on being a refuge for the oppressed. The United States fashioned itself as a global crusader of justice and equality.
Imperialist White-Supremacist Capitalist Patriarchy
(4:26 – 8:41)

This term was coined by Bell Hooks to describe the interlocking systems of oppression that are all functioning simultaneously at all times. Hooks’ genius has offered us a completely revolutionary way to think about our place in society. Often we stratify the systems of oppression in society and choose to place those that directly affect us at the top of the list. However, at all times, all of these forms of oppression are at work and an individuals place in society is affected in some way by these systems. It is these systems that make up the framework for the America’s national identity. In order for any American to understand their station in this country, they must at all times consider the systems at work and the way that they affect every person living within them.

One of the most important things to remember when discussing American Nationalism is to remember that it is not actually about identity in the way we would usually think of it. Often we think of individuals as having identities. So we think about imperialism, white-supremacy, capitalism, and patriarchy as aspects of individuals personalities or the things that certain individuals do. This is incorrect. These things are social systems.
The crucial thing to remember about patriarchy or any other social system is that it’s something that people participate in. It’s an arrangement of shared understandings and relationships that connect people to one another and something larger than themselves.
– Allan G. Johnson, Patriarchy, the System
American Nationalism is formed through social systems which require participation is significant because it then suggests that without social acceptance, these systems will fail. In order to gain social acceptance from individuals institutions, such as family, religion, academia, legal systems, and mass media, are infused with the characteristics of American Nationalism. Then the institutions convince individuals to believe in and buy into American Nationalism of their own free will.
The Problem

The fact that the United States sought to create a national identity was not the problem — that part is logical for a fledgling country. The problem is that America sought to force its identity upon its inhabitants and its ideology on the world. America required. It was originally thought that the United States would unify the oppressed peoples of the world and give them a place where they could be treated as human beings. It was expected that the people who fled to the United States would adopt the national identity in place of their own ethnic heritage.

The power of American Nationalism, for its defenders, is that it has enabled the “widening of we.” — This process allowed for the incorporation of not-quite-white, but not-quite-not-white Irish, Jewish, and Southern and eastern European immigrants into the canons of whiteness through the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries making them Americans first in a legal and then in a cultural sense.
– Nikhil Pal Singh, Black is a Country
It was expected that there would be a universal American identity that all citizens would  want to ascribe to. Much like their British predecessors, the American forefathers never once considered that any ideology other than their own could be right. They believed that everyone would want to ascribe to their philosophies. When they didn’t; America forced them. The problem is that American nationalism is about domination: dominating the inhabitants, dominating the economic market, dominating women, dominating non-White races, and dominating foreign countries. America may have begun as a crusader of oppressed people but somewhere along the line America became the very thing that the original colonists had sought to oppose.
The Point
Any American seeking to explore the truth about who and where they are in this country must begin with an understanding of who this country is. This brief account of the development of American Nationalism is by no mans all encompassing; however it provides a rudimentary understanding of who America is and how we came to be who we are.
When we explore where we began and the intentions that we began with, we can then explore where we are and the huge disparity between the two. This contradiction in the American identity is crucial to understanding, on an individual level, why various individuals are where they are and why it seems that they can never escape the circumstances surrounding their situation. It is because despite what the American philosophy espouses about life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness the truth is that the systems that are holding this country together are in complete opposition to those ideals. Those systems are about limitations, control, and reproduction of the system.
We have to constantly critique imperialist white-supremacist patriarchal culture because it is normalized by mass media and rendered unproblematic.
– Bell Hooks, Homegrown: Engaged Cultural Criticism
Americans in general are fairly ignorant in regards to international relations and, therefore, usually have no idea what America looks like in the eyes of the world. We assume — because we are socialized to — that America is a great world leader with global power that is undeniable. Perhaps at one time. What we have become is a global bully with delusions of grandeur. And much of what the individual feels on a personal level is a backlash of the pushing of an international and national agenda that America has to tell the world — including its own citizens — one thing and to behave as another. And every act of activism in this country is about holding America accountable for the promises that it has made; about reminding America of how far she has fallen from her admirable beginnings, in the hopes that she will see the error of her ways and return to those ambitious hopes upon which she was built.
I’m not sayin; I’m just sayin,
An Angry Black Man
Hooks, Bell. Homegrown: Engaged Cultural Criticism. South End Press. February 2006.
Johnson, Allan G. Patriarchy, the System.
Paine, Thomas. Common Sense.
Lazarus, Emma. New Colossus.
Singh, Nikhil Pal. Black is a Country: race and the unfinished struggle for democracy. First Harvard University Press. 2004.


I went into a store the other day and saw a sign that said that the business would be closed in observation of Columbus day. As I left the store a gnawing feeling persisted in my stomach. I didn’t realize any businesses still recognized Columbus day and I was unsettled about the idea that some still did.

The Story

When I was in school we learned about American history. They often started with Columbus’ exploration of the “New World.” I remember they made us learn a rhyme that helped us remember the facts about Christopher Columbus. “In 1492, Christopher Columbus sailed the ocean blue…” When my father heard me recite the rhyme I remember him sitting me down and telling me what made no sense to me at the time. My father said that not everything they would teach me in school was correct. As a child I remember thinking that was crazy. Why would a teacher, under the support of the entire school system, teach us something false? My father told me that there were other people who had traveled to North America before Columbus and that even those people found people already living there. My father said “You can’t discover something that wasn’t lost.”

Despite the fact that I couldn’t conceive of everything my father said, a seed had been planted in me. He had challenged me to ask my teacher about Amerigo Vespucci and Leif Ericson. He told me to ask about how Columbus discovered a place with people already living there and what Columbus did to those people he met in North America. So, I went to school and asked my teacher those questions. She answered vaguely about Vespucci and Erikson but my challenge about the Native Americans made her silent. She basically brushed my inquiries off because she need to “move on with the lesson.” I think that was the day I began to be a truth seeker. I didn’t like knowing that I was being intentionally misinformed. I realized that information gives power to those who wield it and those who never question or seek answers for themselves are manipulated.


The Birth of American Colonization and Imperialism

Why would we possibly want to celebrate Columbus day in this day and age, with all information we have regarding the truth about Christopher Columbus? I can only think that because America is very good at ignoring and/or disregarding the truth in favor of tradition and nostalgia. We treat the truth as if it is some annoying insect with which we have decided that we can’t kill but won’t be bother by. It’s an ignorant and sad fact. There are businesses and organizations that won’t even celebrate Martin Luther King’s birthday; however, we can still commemorate Columbus because it represents a historical moment in American history.

Columbus day can and should be remembered. It should be remembered for being the starting point of European colonization which eventually led to slaughter and enslavement for the “New World” (by New World I mean new to Europeans). It is shameful that European culture was so narcissistic and self absorbed that they didn’t imagine a world outside their own and when they “discovered” it, they couldn’t handle or respect that fact that someone had already “discovered” it. Those indigenous people had to be barbarians that were not worthy or the land, gold, and riches of the land the already populated. So surely they needed the Europeans to come and control it for them. And if those native people didn’t acquiesce, Europe would take it by force. This was colonization and imperialism.

It is not wonder, then, that the European colonists who broke away from Europe to inhabit North America, held within them the same principle of fascism and destruction. Everything they despised the monarchy for, they brought with them to America. The foundation of America is built upon this European inspired need for domination and conquest in order to show themselves powerful and better than anything else they encounter.


The Point

If we need another paid holiday, can’t we change the name and purpose of this one and still give people the time off?? Or better yet maybe we should celebrate this day the way Latin Americans do with Dia de la Raza, where they celebrate the resistance against the colonizing invaders. I would love to celebrate Native Americans Day or True Americans Day or The Only Americans Day or something that would recognize the Native Americans as the initiators of the first resistance against imperialism. Maybe take the day to give respect to the descendants of those Native Americans, who truly are Americans. But as usual, America is addicted to ignorance and cannot stand to correct its errors.

If Columbus day means anything to America, it is this: that we can trace the history of our greatest sins and flaws. That after all these centuries, we have yet to outgrow our fascist belief that the world needs us to lead it (by force if necessary). So if I should think of Columbus and do anything on Columbus Day, I should repent on behalf of America. As an American I should spend Columbus Day begging forgiveness for the blood that was shed, for the lies that were told, for the enslavement that allowed the country where I know live to exist. If nothing else we should allow ourselves to take this day to see what we have become and how we started on the wrong path so long ago, it’s repulsive to think that we haven’t yet evolved to a point that we can see people as human beings and not opportunities for exploitation, that we cannot see the differences among us as the chance to learn and be better. Instead we fear what we don’t understand, never take the time to understand it, and destroy it when it won’t become like us. That’s the legacy of Christopher Columbus.

I’m not sayin, I’m just sayin,

An Angry Black Man